Skip to main content

About your Search

20131101
20131130
STATION
CNBC 11
LANGUAGE
English 11
Search Results 0 to 10 of about 11
CNBC
Nov 18, 2013 7:00pm EST
be willing to jettison obama care too? let's talk. here is democratic strategist steve mcmahon. jenkins of the "wall street journal" editorial board. paul howard from the manhattan institute. and joining us shortly, veteran political analyst larry sabato. it's kind of like, i don't know, deja vu all over again. the white house is capitulating. the insurance companies can do it better. this is where we started. why don't we just stay there and let the insurance companies do that? why do we need this gigantic state-run bureaucracy? >> well, the insurance companies selling obama care policies is just a stopgap. they still expect to get the exchange up and running. they're simply trying to make sure it doesn't all go kaput between now and then. secondly, the catastrophic medicare thing was a, bipartisan, b, kind of a small law. it wasn't going to discredit anybody's political career, certainly not president reagan's. so i don't think that the obama people are going to give up the ghost quite as quickly as dan rostenkowski and ronald reagan did. >> okay. maybe. so small is a relative term. l
CNBC
Nov 14, 2013 7:00pm EST
to be joined by senator ron johnson and steve scalise at 7:30. first up, let's ask our health care experts what they think about the president's announcements today. joining us is gavin newson, bob, president of health policy and hchl hadley heath. there may be less there than meets the eye regarding what president obama said as reported by our own bob harwood and robert costa. up to the insurance commissioners, up to the insurance companies themselves. do you think canceled policies will be restored in any bulk size? >> probably not. this is really an administrative mess. one company has said that they are going to try to do it, florida bluecross. most other companies are having a good time with this. this is nothing more than the president throwing the hot poe pat toe about cancellations back to the health insurance companies. the insurance companies, to do this, only have 31 days to right the ship here. this is coming from the president who built healthcare.gov in three years and it doesn't work and he's telling the insurance industry that in 31 days, because december 15th is the deadline, t
CNBC
Nov 7, 2013 7:00pm EST
revealed bad news from businesses and consumers. we have a bull/bear debate coming up with steve forbes and brian west bury. and we'll get you updated on today's market selloff. obama care has nothing to do with free market capitalism. we'll be right back. when we made our commitment to the gulf, bp had two big goals: help the gulf recover and learn from what happened so we could be a better, safer energy company. i can tell you - safety is at the heart of everything we do. we've added cutting-edge technology, like a new deepwater well cap and a state-of-the-art monitoring center, where experts watch over all drilling activity twenty-four-seven. and we're sharing what we've learned, so we can all produce energy more safely. our commitment has never been stronger. >>> all eyes on the economy ahead of tomorrow's important jobs report. today we saw third quarter gdp growth came in at 2.8%. sounds good. but i think it's masking a lot of issues in there. take a look at consumer spending, only up 1.5%. and also business equipment spending, or investment, that's the the heart of it and creates
CNBC
Nov 20, 2013 7:00pm EST
strong last month. gold falling. i love that. are we going to get 3% growth or bether? we asked steve who is a chief u.s. economist and joe the head economist at deutsch chi back. we're also the well, there's not been move going forward. it looks like kwul 4 gdp lp advised. they cited record back logs and very high ism. i think it continues this quarter. we have growth over 3, 3 1/2 so i am agreeing to this. steve, let me get your tax on that, the third quarter will be revised up. the re5789, you've had one nice quarter. it will result at home. i disagree with watching the ism as app indicator telling you what industrial production has to do. indus still have production is seeing what's actually happened? >> john burns, i think he made this point. in a not, he wasn't foop dropper health. i just claysed sick like a dye from 3.p, that's triple a is it not? >> it obviously. it's pores flow. this is in addition to higher edge kite at this prices, house. >> steve, home sales went down today. they were very disappointing. there is a school of thought that says the prior interest rate hike is sl
CNBC
Nov 5, 2013 7:00pm EST
york city moving to the far left. let's talk to democratic strategist, steve mcman. robert costa. i want to go to you. i want to pin de blasio on you. this is the guy who's going to be the next mayor of new york. this guy is so far to the left. he is way to your left. this guy is fighting ray kelly and the new york police department successful crime attemp attempts. he wants to tax himself. he'd rather risk people moving out of the state. today they say he wants to appoint randy weingarten to run the board of education. why are the democrats trying to destroy new york city. >> good evening, larry. how are you? >> i'm good. nkts you know, bill de blasio is an unrepen tent, unapologetic democrat. it won't surprise everyone what he's going to do. the real question is what happened to new york city that so many people turned away from the policies of mike bloomberg and have turned so robustly toward the policies of bill de blasio. he's going to win it. the margin is a little surprising to me. good for you, bill. >> i'm not so sure. maybe it's bloomberg. my pal joe lhota didn't run a goo
CNBC
Nov 21, 2013 7:00pm EST
and democratic strategist steve murphy and former white house press secretary arrei fleischer. i think you won't disagree in a this thing is a bad scene. the question is, what should democrats do if you were counseling them how do they dig themselves out of this mess? >> we have to make it work. we have got to get the problems fixed so it works as it was originally intended. it's not just the website getting fixed. it's the basic concept that has to fulfill -- be fulfilled according to plan. it is this why i disagree with what you said about california being bad. that's good for the future of obama care for two reasons. a one year extension as the president proposed, the states that will implement that are just kicking it into the time line of just the next election. that won't help us politically. and number two, we need -- those substandard plans under obama care, they have to go away for obama care to work. they have to be eliminated. we have to get the healthy people paying for a full plan. >> i think you were on a roll until you hit the last sentence or two. because ari fleischer, i have
CNBC
Nov 25, 2013 7:00pm EST
up, even harry reid says more sanctions may be needed instead. nbc's steve handelsman joins us now with the details. steve? >> reporter: michelle, thanks. here in washington a lot of senators in both political parties say they're ready to vote like the house already has for tougher sanctions. but president obama is asking them, and when he spoke today to israel's benjamin netanyahu, he also presumably asked the hard-line israeli leader give me six more months to see if this new, some would say softer diplomatic approach can work to get iran to give up building the bomb. the president spoke today in san francisco. >> none of that is going to be easy. huge challenges remain. but we cannot close the door on diplomacy. and we cannot rule out peaceful solutions to the world's problems. we cannot commit ourselves to an endless cycle of conflict. and tough talk and bluster may be the easy thing to do politically, but it's not the right thing for our kurt. security. it's not the right thing for our security. >> so the iranians will get access to some of their cash frozen in foreign banks a
CNBC
Nov 4, 2013 7:00pm EST
reinstitute that in the united states is nuts, but that's just my view. i want to bring in steve conover. you've got pretty impressive numbers here, and 129 million people according to your plans, according to your calculations. 129 million people either lose their insurance or have to get much higher premium insurance. is that true? how'd you get there? >> well, that is true. spinners like david axelrod have been claiming that this problem will only affect 5% of americans. the people that are getting nongroup coverage. that's not true. that's absolutely false. this problem of losing coverage is going to affect employer -- people with employer-based plans as well. now, out of that 129 million, only 18 to 50 million actually will lose their plan and have to start from scratch. but the rest will be ending up buying more expensive coverage because they have to pay for it. >> those are big numbers, chris. the top of the ranges are huge potential numbers. and then your second point, which is coming out this memo that nbc got, the obama administration now realizes premium increases may be just as d
CNBC
Nov 19, 2013 7:00pm EST
's an allegation out there, we are very far from perfect. >> that's why i say so far nothing. steve liesman, i can't believe we both gave bernanke a "b." >> more of a meeting of the minds -- >> you have accused me of watching the data in the past. >> okay. >> now time for the main event of "the kudlow report" tonight. we have scott walker about to join us to talk about obama care, budgets, and will he be a presidential candidate in 2016? as always, don't forget free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity. scott walker knows that's true, that's why we love him. "the kudlow report" is coming right back. >>> i was not informed directly that the website would not be working. as the way it was supposed to. had i been informed i wouldn't be saying boy, this will be great. >> say it ain't so, mr. president. turns out this might go down as yet another obama care falsehood. i'm being very polite about that, because of my respect for the office. we learned today that the white house was in fact clearly warned way back in march by the respected consulting firm mckenzie & company that the healthcare
CNBC
Nov 22, 2013 7:00pm EST
by staff -- i don't know, art, the letter was to you or to steve moore or to me or somebody disowning saying the reagan tax cuts helped the rich and the kennedy tax cuts didn't help the rich, which is utter nonsense. if anything, the kennedy tax cuts had more powerful incentive effects than the reagan tax cuts. >> yeah, it was for sure to steve moore. i think it was addressed to me as well. but i'm not sure. and it was co-authored by caroline as well. but the truth of the matter is, bobby kennedy was as pro-tax cuts and growth as was jack kennedy. the problem with the younger kennedys is they never got to get the direct experience from their fathers. they never did. they were told about their dads from all sorts of other people because their dads were killed. and what happened is i took joe kennedy in to patrick moynahan's office to explain to him what bobby kennedy was going to run on in that race, which was really going to be reagan's tax cuts. >> i know you worked on joe. i remember that period. >> joe was wonderful. joe is great. >> joe's a great guy. it didn't really rub off. >>
CNBC
Nov 15, 2013 7:00pm EST
! where most stop, not. we're pretty much on steve ground here. i'm pretty positive. >> zack, i hear lee's points. they are solid. the fact that everything seems to be going up is actually what worries me. >> well, that, i think in itself is probably an indication we're not in a 1999 period or the kind of bubble you're talking about. such word would be heresy. while it's understandable in the media we talk about the indices making new highs nasdaq is still 20 plus percent below its mark of 2000 high which means for the past 13 years if you were indexed in that you would still be down. it's hard to depict that in my mind as a bubble and the very fact we're so obsessed on finding the looming bubbles and then pricking them is in itself an indication of the fact while the markets are going up there's no particular frothiness. the definition of things getting exuberant. i'm seeing frustration that people are missing it and skepticism that there's anything fundamental behind it. >> if this market is headed higher which sectors will take us there. when you look at the 10 s&p sectors many are tr
Search Results 0 to 10 of about 11